Hey guys!
As usual: English is not my mothers tongue & you will probably find tons of terrible mistakes in this post. Please let me know about those that caused you physical pain, so that i can work on that :)
Although I am not a genius in HU play, i do have a few games under my belt. I actually learned the most I know about HU-SNGs from "trujm", a very good HU-player who ran "holdemforaliving.com", a free site dedicated solely to HU-SNGs. Unfortunately no-one knows where he's at & the site is offline since august last year. BTW: No, he's not broke. Sharkscope says he has still got >$50k in HU-winnings, playing $220 and lower. I hope that's enough to post something about HU SNGS :)
BRM is pretty much the most important thing that you should know about if you you want to play these games at least semi-serious. If you plan to play HU regularly, be aware of the fact that huge swings (+15 BI/ -15BI) in a day are normal and are not an indicator if you are good or if you suck. Thats why BRM & emotional control/tilting prevention (probably worth to write a separate post) are vital aspects of these games.
To make a long story short: I'd say that you should have something between 40-50 BIs for the stakes that you want to play on a regular basis/ be a regular at. They stakes where 'measurable' amounts of money can be made start at ~$10 imo.
And don't be afraid, the skill level does not differ too much from the micro-stakes games... But let's get back to the topic: Like in pretty much every other area of poker it's not a good idea to take $400-$500 dollars out of your pocket to start off playing for 'measurable money' and leave the lower limits behind unplayed. Your level of play should grow with the limits, if you leave out limits you obv can't achieve this. On the other hand: Let's be honest, the skill-level at the micro games is - even compared to 6max and fullring-sngs - .... quite low. So if you don't want to invest weeks or even month to get to the $10-games, your BRM in the phase of BRB (Bankroll-Building) can be a little bit more progressive. But don't feel forced to do so. If you feel better with sticking to the 40-50 BI-approach, do so. I just wanted to show up an alternative here. I don't want to just pitch a number into the room, because there is a better alternative imo:
BRM for HU SNGs by the Kelly criterion
Although it comes from gambling, there is a lot of value in it, as long as it is used adequately imo. The biggest advantage of the KC in my eyes is, that it is very customizable. I don't want to annoy you with the formula, if you want to look it up you can find it at wikipedia by typing in "Kelly criterion" (btw: I am not very smart, so could someone please tell me how i can post links, lol?!). The KC takes highly individual aspects into consideration, such as
- the expected ROI: not everyone can expect the same outcome and
- the tolerated risk of ruin: Some people don't want to deposit at all, some people don't mind.
I made the effort to incorporate the formula into an excel sheet. Link: http://www.fileuploadx.de/918299
This sheet allows two options to use the formula, just fill in the light blue cells and it should spit out a result. i hope it's self-explanatory. If not, just let me know.
GL to all of you!
Doom